<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Somehow, I&#8217;m not surprised&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.dreamweavers-quilts.com/quilt-epiphany/2008/03/11/somehow-im-not-surprised/</link>
	<description>Musings on Quilts and Quilting</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nadine</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamweavers-quilts.com/quilt-epiphany/2008/03/11/somehow-im-not-surprised/#comment-2485</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dreamweavers-quilts.com/quilt-epiphany/2008/03/11/somehow-im-not-surprised/#comment-2485</guid>
					<description>Hi Pat, and welcome!  It's interesting to hear your point of view, being one of the finalists as you were.  I agree with the idea of splitting the prize money amongst the categories.  However, as I understand the judging system as it's utilized in large shows today, all quilts are first judged on their own merits, &lt;em&gt;within their style and technique&lt;/em&gt;.  

Is a machine quilted quilt the finest example of machine technique and style mastery in the show?  Are the quilting stitches and patterning on a hand quilted quilt the best done by hand in the show?  When quilts of differing styles are competing for "Best of Show" top honors, much weight is given to whether each quilt is a better and more masterfully executed example &lt;em&gt;within it's own style and technique&lt;/em&gt; than the others.  It's not the actually techniques or style that's compared, it's the artist's mastery of the technique or style.  I would say a point system makes this assessment easier for the judges to make that final call.

Even understanding how it all works, I have never wanted to be a quilt judge, nor do I envy them their task.  

Perhaps the biggest problem crazy quilters face is the same one that art quilters faced years ago:  basic acceptance that their work is actually "quilts."  I'm not sure that the CQ community wouldn't be better served by doing what the art quilt community has done, and start dedicated CQ shows, if there aren't any out there already (not being a CQ'er, maybe I missed it and there already is one).  

I know there is a huge vendor section at Houston each year called Embellishment (or was? now that I'm looking for it, I can't see that they're doing that this year. :( ) .  I think it would be great to have that show stand on it's own, with a judged show just for crazy quilts and related art.  Having said all that, there will always be quilters and artists producing art that is not mainstream, and tends to get short shrift or fall through the cracks in the average quilt show or contest.

Thanks for stopping by Pat! Your comments were thought provoking, obviously. Good luck with your crazy quilts, and your book.  You do beautiful work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pat, and welcome!  It&#8217;s interesting to hear your point of view, being one of the finalists as you were.  I agree with the idea of splitting the prize money amongst the categories.  However, as I understand the judging system as it&#8217;s utilized in large shows today, all quilts are first judged on their own merits, <em>within their style and technique</em>.  </p>
<p>Is a machine quilted quilt the finest example of machine technique and style mastery in the show?  Are the quilting stitches and patterning on a hand quilted quilt the best done by hand in the show?  When quilts of differing styles are competing for &#8220;Best of Show&#8221; top honors, much weight is given to whether each quilt is a better and more masterfully executed example <em>within it&#8217;s own style and technique</em> than the others.  It&#8217;s not the actually techniques or style that&#8217;s compared, it&#8217;s the artist&#8217;s mastery of the technique or style.  I would say a point system makes this assessment easier for the judges to make that final call.</p>
<p>Even understanding how it all works, I have never wanted to be a quilt judge, nor do I envy them their task.  </p>
<p>Perhaps the biggest problem crazy quilters face is the same one that art quilters faced years ago:  basic acceptance that their work is actually &#8220;quilts.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not sure that the CQ community wouldn&#8217;t be better served by doing what the art quilt community has done, and start dedicated CQ shows, if there aren&#8217;t any out there already (not being a CQ&#8217;er, maybe I missed it and there already is one).  </p>
<p>I know there is a huge vendor section at Houston each year called Embellishment (or was? now that I&#8217;m looking for it, I can&#8217;t see that they&#8217;re doing that this year. <img src='http://www.dreamweavers-quilts.com/quilt-epiphany/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  ) .  I think it would be great to have that show stand on it&#8217;s own, with a judged show just for crazy quilts and related art.  Having said all that, there will always be quilters and artists producing art that is not mainstream, and tends to get short shrift or fall through the cracks in the average quilt show or contest.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by Pat! Your comments were thought provoking, obviously. Good luck with your crazy quilts, and your book.  You do beautiful work!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamweavers-quilts.com/quilt-epiphany/2008/03/11/somehow-im-not-surprised/#comment-2484</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dreamweavers-quilts.com/quilt-epiphany/2008/03/11/somehow-im-not-surprised/#comment-2484</guid>
					<description>I agree, I still would have entered if the prize was much smaller. I think they should have split the prize among each category. There is no way on earth a crazy quilt can be judged along side a machine sewn quilt. I know they used a point system, but it still isn't possible when you consider the hand stitching compared to a drawn on pattern stitched by machine. Bella was beautiful, and in no way did I think my crazy quilt was a winner,but quilts cannot be judged fairly in this way. I have made several traditional quilts, and they do not compare to the CQ as far as originality and hand work. I did have fun, and was quite honored just to be a finalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I still would have entered if the prize was much smaller. I think they should have split the prize among each category. There is no way on earth a crazy quilt can be judged along side a machine sewn quilt. I know they used a point system, but it still isn&#8217;t possible when you consider the hand stitching compared to a drawn on pattern stitched by machine. Bella was beautiful, and in no way did I think my crazy quilt was a winner,but quilts cannot be judged fairly in this way. I have made several traditional quilts, and they do not compare to the CQ as far as originality and hand work. I did have fun, and was quite honored just to be a finalist.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
